javascript - Why should the "key" part in a JS hashdict be a string? - Stack Overflow

In most JSON serializers/deserializers, the "key" part in a javascript dictionary/hash array is written as a string.

What is the benefit of using a string as the key as opposed to just typing the intended name in?

For example, say I define two objects k1 and k2 like so:

var k1 = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 };          // define name normally
var k2 = { "a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3 };    // define name with a string

And I then ran the following tests:

alert(k1 == k2);                   // false (of course)

alert(k1.a == k2.a);               // true
alert(k1["b"] == k2["b"]);         // true

alert(uneval(k1));                 // returns the k1 object literal notation.
alert(uneval(k2));                 // returns the same string as above line.

alert(uneval(k1) == uneval(k2));   // true

So what's the point of having the keys be in double-quotation marks (a string) as in the way k2 was defined instead of just typing the key names in as in the way k1 was defined?

---

I just saw this over at Ajaxian pointing to Aaron Boodman's blog entry:

chromium.tabs.createTab({
 "url": "/",
 "selected": true,
 "tabIndex": 3
});

Since he also use camel case for tabIndex, I don't see any point in using a string at all.

Why not:

chromium.tabs.createTab({
 url: "/",
 selected: true,
 tabIndex: 3
});

Why would a JS ninja follows the convention of turning url, selected and tabIndex into a string?

In most JSON serializers/deserializers, the "key" part in a javascript dictionary/hash array is written as a string.

What is the benefit of using a string as the key as opposed to just typing the intended name in?

For example, say I define two objects k1 and k2 like so:

var k1 = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 };          // define name normally
var k2 = { "a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3 };    // define name with a string

And I then ran the following tests:

alert(k1 == k2);                   // false (of course)

alert(k1.a == k2.a);               // true
alert(k1["b"] == k2["b"]);         // true

alert(uneval(k1));                 // returns the k1 object literal notation.
alert(uneval(k2));                 // returns the same string as above line.

alert(uneval(k1) == uneval(k2));   // true

So what's the point of having the keys be in double-quotation marks (a string) as in the way k2 was defined instead of just typing the key names in as in the way k1 was defined?

---

I just saw this over at Ajaxian pointing to Aaron Boodman's blog entry:

chromium.tabs.createTab({
 "url": "http://www.google./",
 "selected": true,
 "tabIndex": 3
});

Since he also use camel case for tabIndex, I don't see any point in using a string at all.

Why not:

chromium.tabs.createTab({
 url: "http://www.google./",
 selected: true,
 tabIndex: 3
});

Why would a JS ninja follows the convention of turning url, selected and tabIndex into a string?

• javascript
• dictionary
• coding-style

Share Follow edited Apr 7, 2009 at 18:43 chakrit asked Apr 7, 2009 at 18:24 chakritchakrit 61.6k2525 gold badges137137 silver badges163163 bronze badges

Add a ment  | 

4 Answers 4

Sorted by: Reset to default 7

Because JSON is a subset of the actual JavaScript literal syntax. For simplicity in implementing JSON parsers, double quotes are always required around strings, and as keys in JSON are strings, they are required there.

Not all legal JavaScript is legal JSON. While you can define object literals in JavaScript without the quotes, if you want interoperable JSON, you're going to need to put them in.

Because doing so, you avoid to use, by error, a javascript reserved keyword, like "do" for example. Using the string notation kept you on the safe side.

If the syntax diagram at json is to be believed, bareword property names are nonstandard. How many browsers did you run your tests on?

Apart from getting away from reserved keywords you can actually use whatever characters in your property names - including spaces, colons...

Not really sure why would you do that. I prefer using the normal "object" notation.